



Begriffe, Krankheiten, Einrichtungen u.v.m., verknüpft mit dem zuständigen Bereich.
Im Menüpunkt "Übersicht" sind Einrichtungen unter verschiedenen Gesichtspunkten gruppiert: Kliniken, Abteilungen, Institute, Zentrale Einrichtungen und ähnliches.
PostuRob I
|
|
Content
Introduction
PostuRob 1 is the first of a series of testing devices for our model of human postural control. It was built by the "Wissenschaftlichen Werkstätten" of the Neuro-Center Freiburg. Its anthropometric parameters are similar to those of a human (see below) and therefore it serves well for determine the performance of a given postural control model, by comparing its behavior with those of human subjects during postural experiments. The models can be implemented in Simulink(R) and "downloaded" into the robot. This gives us a platform for comparing across different human postural control models.
PostuRob 1 has only one degree of freedom (ankle joints), representing an "inverted pendulum" model of human posture.
Our direct sensory interaction model (see Maurer et al. 2006, Exp. Brain Res. 171) is able to produce voluntary lean movements while compensating at the same time for surface tilts and pull disturbances in the sagittal plane. It is capable of these task also while standing on a BSRP (Body Sway Referenced platform ) (see videos below for demonstration) or foam rubber.
This document describes general aspects of the robot and its testing environment. For futher information and references see Maurer et al. 2006, Exp. Brain Res. 171.
Technical Information
The technical sensors used in the robot were
- Goniometers (SP2801 A502, Novotechnik, Ostfildern, Germany),
- Force sensors (Type 8526-6001, Burster, Gernsbach, Germany), and a combination of
- Gyrometer and Accelerometers (Types ADXRS401and ADXL203, respectively, Analog Devices, Norwood, USA).
Sensor data is fed via a custom made hardware and AD device into the control model implemented under Simulink/Matlab on an Embedded-PC (MOPSlcd7, Kontron, Deggendorf, Germany). Biologically identified non-linearities (thresholds, sensor weighting mechanism) and a dead time of 150 ms are implemented as well.
The dimensions of the robot followed anthropometric data of a 1.9 m tall and 62 kg person.
| Height (h) | 1.90m |
| Weigth (m) | 62kg |
| Spring constant (representing tendons) | 48 N/mm |
| COM height | 0.91m |
for a more detailed description of the robots parameters see here
Actuators: Pneumatic muscles (MAS20, Festo, Esslingen, Germany), were used to mimic ankle joint muscles.
The pneumatic valves (proportional directional control valves, MPYE-5-1/4-010-B, Festo, Esslingen, Germany) are controlled by a cascading control of air-pressure and torque/force. Force sensors in the muscle fixations are used to yield a desired active torque while air-pressure is controled seamlessly by the hardware. For the task under investigation, the actuators can be considered to show essentially ideal performance. We added to them in-series springs to mimic the tendons. The effect of the spring is chosen to be < m*g*h (gravity g= 9.81 m/(s^2)) which would be too small to keep the robot upright passively.
Actuator Performance
|
Testing environment
Testing environment for the robot is our posturographic laboratory.
|
|
Stimulation devices are a mechanical motion platform and servo-controlled cable winches for pull stimulation. External platform tilt and body pull stimuli are applied my means of a PC and custom made software.
Measuring devices comprise a force platform mounted on the motion platform to register the Center of Pressure/COP (Kistler®, platform type 9286, Winterthur, Switzerland) and an optoelectronic device for kinematic measures (Optotrak 3020®, Waterloo, Canada).
Acquisition of stimulus parameters, robot position and platform position is performed by means of another PC via analog-digital converter (sampling rate, 100 Hz) and software programmed in LabView® (National Instruments, Austin, Texas).
Data Analysis are performed off-line with custom-made software programmed in MATLAB® (The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA).
Publications
- Karim Thaboub and Thomas Mergner:
"Biological and engineering approaches to human postural control" (pdf)
Video"
-
Demonstration of the BSRP (Quicktime, 18MB)
The platform is following the body-in-space angle, so that the body-to-foot angle is kept constant.
-
Voluntary movement (Quicktime, 30MB)
Amplitude: 3° , frequency: 0.3Hz
-
Voluntary movement with additional platform-tilt (Quicktime, 58MB)
voluntary amplitude: 3°, voluntary frequency: 0.3Hz
platform amplitude: 4°, platform frequency: 0.2Hz
-
Demonstration of the BSRP (Quicktime, 18MB)
The platform is following the body-in-space angle, so that the body-to-foot angle is kept constant.
-
BSRP with additional pull stimulus (Quicktime, 25MB)
-
BSRP with additional platform tilt (Quicktime, 64MB)
the body-to-foot angle now is controlled independently of the body-in-space angle:
amplitude: 2°, frequency: 0.2 Hz
-
Pull-stimulus on foam rubber (Quicktime, 12MB)
Roadmap
PostuRob1
- Adding a visual system
PostuRob2
- Adding a hip joint
Team
- Prof. Dr. Thomas Mergner
- Dr. Georg Schweigart
- Dr. Christoph Maurer
- Luminous Fennell





